Creatinine Use Among the Young in Bodybuilding

It has been a proven fact that many youngworkouts.
bodybuilders, within the age range of 18-22 are usingThe main point here is that even if the evidence is
performance-enhancing drugs. While many of theseanecdotal (or from interviews), the potential dangers
drugs are not illegal in the United States and otherremain. Empirical proof need not always be the basis
countries per se, it remains to be seen whetherof spotting the danger signs.
long-term effects would be beneficial.For a long time now, medical science has been
Common drugdependent on anecdotal evidence even for the
Often, undergraduate bodybuilders usediscovery of new forms of medicine. Biological
performance-enhancing drugs to improve theirprospecting for one would not be possible without the
workouts and to increase their mass building. Theuse of anecdotal data.
pressure to be more than fit is a key indicator that thisCauses
trend will continue.According to the researchers, the use of steroids and
The most commonly used substance is creatinine,other similar substances to enhance bodybuilding may
which fortunately has not shown any deadly sidehave a psychological precession:
effects. However, medical science points at a peculiar“Research on steroid use suggests that
truth about building: the body should be allowed to buildpsychological variables may be important. Lovstakken,
mass and strength on its own.Peterson and Homer (1999) found some positive
Potentially harmful effectsexpectations of the effects of steroids associated
According to David M. Williams, Eileen S. Anderson,with higher risk of steroid use, and negative social
Richard E. Winett, researchers for the Journal of Sportexpectations associated with lower risk of steroid use
Behavior:among college students.”
“Creatine may be a gateway drug to other moreBecause of the perceived causes of increased use,
harmful performance enhancing substances such assome researchers have made it a point to actually
dehydroepiandrosterone (i.e., DHEA) andintervene. Williams, et alia, continue:
androstenedione.”“Goldberg et al. (1996) used a psycho-educational
“Numerous anecdotal accounts illustrate adverseintervention to decrease intentions to use steroids and
side effects, such as kidney dysfunction, effects onincrease resistance-training self-efficacy in male high
the body's creatine and insulin production, diarrhea,school athletes.”
gastrointestinal pain, muscle cramping, andIntervention and critical insight
dehydration.”The researchers stated that there must always be a
“Although laboratory studies of creatine's efficacycritical eye on the variables that link together social
are numerous,field studies of creatine supplementationexpectations and bodybuilding. A usable theoretical
patterns have been scarce. This is especially trueframework for such inquiry is as follows:
among young, male, resistance trainers, who are the“Social cognitive theory provides a useful theoretical
target of marketing strategies that emphasizeframework for understanding creatine use by
creatine's ability to increase body mass.”addressing its specific behavioral, personal, and
Like all performance-enhancing drugs, the mostenvironmental influences.”
commonly used drug seems to have its own set of“That is, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies
bad effects. For one, creatinine affects the wayspecifically related to the use of creatine can help us
energy is stored and used. Second, it affects theunderstand why some resistance trainers use creatine
amount of protein used and expended duringwhile others do not.